£320 - fixed fee, £650 Escape Fee Threshold
A detailed explanation of legal aid crime fees for police station attendance in England and Wales, covering fixed fees, duty solicitor work, compliance requirements and billing obligations.
Legal aid crime fees for police station attendance occupy a distinctive and foundational position within the criminal justice system of England and Wales. Police station advice represents the first formal point at which a suspect is afforded publicly funded legal assistance, often at a moment of acute vulnerability and potential jeopardy. The remuneration framework governing this work is therefore not merely an administrative construct but a practical mechanism through which access to justice is delivered at the earliest stage of criminal proceedings. Understanding how police station fees operate, and the obligations that attach to them, is essential for any provider undertaking criminal legal aid work.
Police station advice is generally delivered under the duty solicitor scheme or pursuant to own-client arrangements, both of which are regulated by the Legal Aid Agency under the Standard Crime Contract. The remuneration for such work is predominantly governed by fixed fees, reflecting a policy objective of administrative simplicity and predictability of cost. These fixed fees are intended to cover all work carried out in advising a suspect at the police station, whether in person or by telephone, including preparation, attendance, and follow-up work directly connected to the police station matter.
The fixed fee regime applies irrespective of the duration of the attendance or the complexity of the issues involved. This reflects an assumption that, across a sufficiently large volume of cases, the demands of straightforward matters will balance those of more complex ones. However, in practice, police station work frequently extends beyond what might reasonably be characterised as routine. Lengthy interviews, multiple consultations, consideration of extensive disclosure, and the management of vulnerable clients can result in significant demands on a practitioner’s time and expertise, all of which must be absorbed within the fixed fee structure.
Remuneration differs depending on whether advice is provided under the duty solicitor scheme or on an own-client basis. Duty solicitor fees are payable where the solicitor attends as part of a police station rota, whereas own-client fees arise where the suspect has specifically requested a particular firm or practitioner. Although the fee structures are broadly comparable, compliance requirements differ subtly, particularly in relation to client verification and record-keeping. Failure to evidence properly the basis upon which a claim is made can result in refusal of payment.
A further distinction exists between telephone advice and in-person attendance. Telephone advice is subject to its own fixed fee, reflecting the reduced time and resources typically required. However, the decision as to whether telephone advice is appropriate must be made with care. The contractual framework makes clear that in-person attendance is required where it is necessary to protect the client’s interests, such as in cases involving serious allegations, vulnerable suspects or complex legal issues. Providing telephone advice in circumstances where attendance is warranted may give rise to compliance concerns and potential contractual breach.
The evidential requirements underpinning police station fee claims are exacting. Providers must maintain accurate and contemporaneous records of all advice given, including attendance notes, interview records and details of any representations made on behalf of the client. These records serve not only as professional safeguards but also as essential evidence in the event of audit or peer review. Inadequate records can lead to the clawback of fees, even where the substantive advice provided was entirely appropriate.
Claims for police station fees must be submitted within strict time limits and in the prescribed format, typically through the Legal Aid Agency’s electronic systems. Late claims are liable to rejection unless exceptional circumstances can be demonstrated, and reliance on discretionary extensions is inherently uncertain. Effective case management systems and internal processes are therefore critical in ensuring that claims are submitted promptly and accurately.
The fixed fee regime for police station work has long been a source of contention within the profession. Many practitioners argue that the level of remuneration fails to reflect the realities of modern police station practice, particularly in cases involving serious offences, complex disclosure or prolonged detention. The increasing use of digital evidence, extended interview techniques and safeguarding considerations has added to the burden borne by defence solicitors, often without corresponding adjustment to fees.
Despite these challenges, the framework does provide limited mechanisms for enhanced remuneration in exceptional circumstances. Where police station work forms part of a case that ultimately qualifies for an escape fee at the magistrates’ court stage, the time spent at the police station may contribute to the overall calculation. However, this is contingent upon detailed time recording and the case exceeding the prescribed thresholds, which is far from guaranteed.
Compliance risk in relation to police station fees should not be underestimated. The Legal Aid Agency routinely audits police station claims, with particular focus on rota compliance, client eligibility, and the appropriateness of the advice provided. Irregularities in rota usage, failure to attend when required, or improper delegation of work can all give rise to serious contractual consequences. In extreme cases, breaches may result in suspension from the duty solicitor scheme, with profound implications for a firm’s criminal practice.
Training and supervision are therefore central to effective police station work. Junior fee earners and accredited representatives must be properly trained not only in substantive criminal law and procedure but also in the contractual and billing framework governing their work. Supervisors bear responsibility for ensuring that standards are maintained and that advice is delivered in accordance with both professional obligations and contractual requirements.
The role of technology in police station billing has become increasingly significant. Electronic time recording, digital attendance notes and integrated billing systems can improve accuracy and efficiency, provided they are used correctly. However, reliance on technology does not obviate the need for professional judgement. Automated systems cannot determine whether attendance was appropriate, whether advice was adequate, or whether the client’s interests were properly protected. These remain matters of professional responsibility.
From a broader perspective, police station legal aid fees must be understood within the wider context of criminal justice funding. Police station advice is often delivered at unsocial hours, under considerable pressure, and in circumstances where early intervention can have a decisive impact on the outcome of a case. The adequacy of remuneration for this work is therefore inextricably linked to the sustainability of the duty solicitor scheme and, by extension, the effective functioning of the criminal justice system as a whole.
There is increasing recognition, both within the profession and among policymakers, that early legal advice at the police station stage can reduce downstream costs by preventing unnecessary charges, narrowing issues and safeguarding procedural fairness. However, the fixed fee structure does not readily capture these broader systemic benefits. As a result, practitioners are often required to absorb significant uncompensated effort in the public interest.
In conclusion, legal aid crime fees for police stations represent a critical, if imperfect, component of publicly funded criminal defence. They underpin the provision of timely and effective legal advice at the earliest stage of criminal proceedings, often in circumstances of considerable complexity and pressure. While the fixed fee regime offers administrative simplicity, it also presents significant challenges in terms of adequacy and sustainability. For providers, a thorough understanding of the fee framework, rigorous compliance, and robust internal systems are essential to ensuring that this vital work can continue to be delivered with professionalism and integrity.
Criminal Legal Aid Manual for providers
For those not already a Lawsyst client and ready to simplify your billing? Contact Lawsyst today for a free consultation. Call 03333 051 345 or email info@lawsyst.co.uk
We share some of the latest video resources relesed by the LAA (credit to the LAA) on this subject.
Legal aid crime fees for police stations are fixed fees payable to solicitors and providers for advising suspects detained at a police station under publicly funded criminal defence arrangements. These fees are designed to cover all work associated with police station advice, including preparation, attendance, consultation, representation during interview and any immediate follow-up directly connected to the detention.
Legal aid at the police station is available to any suspect detained by the police, regardless of means or the seriousness of the allegation. Unlike later stages of criminal proceedings, no means test or merits assessment applies. This reflects the importance of early legal advice in safeguarding procedural rights and ensuring the fairness of the investigative process.
Police station fees are calculated on a fixed fee basis, determined by whether the advice is provided under the duty solicitor scheme or on an own-client basis, and whether the advice is given by telephone or through personal attendance. The fee is payable irrespective of the duration or complexity of the matter, subject to compliance with contractual requirements.
Duty solicitor fees apply where advice is provided through the police station rota system, whereas own-client fees apply where the suspect has specifically requested a particular solicitor or firm. While the remuneration structure is similar, own-client claims require clear evidence of client choice and proper recording of the instruction to avoid challenge by the Legal Aid Agency.
Telephone advice is permitted where it is sufficient to protect the client’s interests, typically in straightforward matters or where no interview is anticipated. However, personal attendance is required where the circumstances demand it, such as in serious cases, where the client is vulnerable, or where disclosure or interview strategy requires in-person representation.
Providers must retain detailed attendance notes, records of advice given, interview notes, and evidence of the basis upon which the advice was provided, including rota details or own-client confirmation. These records must be contemporaneous, accurate and sufficient to demonstrate compliance in the event of audit or peer review.
Police station fees are claimed through the Legal Aid Agency’s electronic systems, in accordance with prescribed formats and within strict time limits. Claims submitted late or without adequate supporting information are liable to rejection, save in exceptional circumstances.
Police station work is generally limited to fixed fees. However, where a case progresses and ultimately qualifies for an escape fee at a later stage, the time spent at the police station may contribute to the overall calculation, provided that accurate time records have been maintained.
Key compliance risks include failure to attend when required, improper use of telephone advice, inadequate record-keeping, rota non-compliance, and incorrect client eligibility recording. Such breaches may result in fee clawback, sanctions or suspension from the duty solicitor scheme.
Police station fees underpin the provision of early legal advice at a stage where suspects are most vulnerable and decisions taken can have lasting consequences. Effective representation at this point safeguards procedural fairness, protects legal rights and can significantly influence the trajectory of a criminal case.
If there’s anything we haven’t covered here or you have any specific questions about your account, just let us know and we’ll be happy to answer them. If you’re not a customer yet but curious about our plans, contact us
