A clear overview of guidance for reporting controlled work, explaining requirements for accurate, timely claims, compliance, audits and proper use of legal aid funding.
Guidance for reporting controlled work forms a crucial part of the legal aid framework, bridging the gap between the provider’s initial decision to grant funding and the Legal Aid Agency’s subsequent assessment of that decision. While controlled work allows providers to act swiftly in the client’s interests, it also carries with it a clear obligation to report the work accurately, transparently and in accordance with published guidance. Understanding this reporting framework is essential for any organisation undertaking publicly funded work.
Reporting controlled work is not simply an administrative exercise. It is the mechanism by which the Legal Aid Agency is informed of the work undertaken, the funding relied upon and the basis on which payment is claimed. Through reporting, providers demonstrate that the eligibility and scope assessments made at the outset were correct, that the work carried out fell within permitted limits, and that public funds have been used appropriately. The quality of reporting therefore has a direct impact on both payment and compliance outcomes.
Legal aid guidance sets out when and how controlled work must be reported. In most cases, reporting takes place at the point of claiming, using the relevant Legal Aid Agency systems. Providers are required to submit accurate information about the category of law, level of service, fee claimed and any relevant client details. This information must align with the evidence held on file. Discrepancies between reported data and file contents are a common source of assessment reductions and audit findings.
Timing is a critical element of reporting guidance. Controlled work claims must be submitted within specified time limits, and failure to do so can result in claims being rejected outright. Providers must therefore have systems in place to monitor when matters conclude, when limits are reached and when claims should be prepared. Effective reporting is as much about process and organisation as it is about understanding the rules.
The guidance also emphasises accuracy in classification. Selecting the correct matter type, level of service and fee scheme is essential. An error at this stage, even if inadvertent, can lead to underpayment or overpayment, both of which create problems. Overclaims may result in recovery action or adverse audit outcomes, while underclaims represent a direct financial loss to the provider. Careful attention to reporting guidance helps avoid both scenarios.
Evidence underpins all reporting of controlled work. Providers must be able to demonstrate, if asked, that the information reported reflects the work actually done. This includes eligibility assessments, scope justification, attendance notes and records of advice. Good reporting practice is therefore inseparable from good file management. One cannot compensate for deficiencies in the other.
Supervision again plays an important role in reporting controlled work. Supervisors should ensure that those responsible for submitting claims understand the guidance and apply it consistently. Spot checks and periodic reviews of reported matters can help identify patterns of error and provide opportunities for corrective learning before issues escalate into formal audit concerns.
Guidance for reporting controlled work should also be read alongside broader contractual and audit guidance. Reporting is one of the primary ways in which the Legal Aid Agency assesses compliance. Consistent errors, late claims or poor-quality submissions may trigger further scrutiny. Conversely, accurate and timely reporting contributes to a positive compliance profile and smoother contract management.
It is also important to recognise that guidance evolves. Changes to fee schemes, reporting processes or digital systems can all affect how controlled work should be reported. Providers must remain alert to updates and ensure that internal procedures are adjusted accordingly. Training and communication are key to ensuring that reporting practices keep pace with external change.
Ultimately, guidance for reporting controlled work exists to support accountability. It ensures that providers can be paid fairly for the work they do, while giving the Legal Aid Agency confidence that public funds are being used properly. When reporting is treated as an integral part of legal aid practice, rather than an afterthought, it supports financial stability, audit readiness and professional credibility.
In conclusion, reporting controlled work in accordance with guidance is a fundamental responsibility for legal aid providers. It requires accuracy, timeliness and consistency, supported by sound supervision and file management. Mastery of reporting guidance not only protects income but also reinforces trust in the controlled work model itself, enabling providers to continue delivering timely legal assistance to those who need it most.
For those not already a Lawsyst client and ready to simplify your billing? Contact Lawsyst today for a free consultation. Call 03333 051 345 or email info@lawsyst.co.uk
We share some of the latest video resources relesed by the LAA (credit to the LAA) on this subject.
Reporting controlled work is the process by which a legal aid provider notifies the Legal Aid Agency of the work undertaken under controlled work funding and submits a claim for payment. It involves accurately recording the category of law, level of service, fee claimed and relevant client details in the appropriate system, in line with legal aid guidance and the evidence held on file.
Controlled work should be reported at the point the matter concludes or when the applicable cost or stage limit is reached, depending on the relevant guidance. Claims must be submitted within prescribed time limits, and failure to do so can result in claims being rejected. Timely reporting is therefore essential to protect payment.
Controlled work is usually reported through the Legal Aid Agency’s digital systems, such as the Online Portal, depending on the category of law and contract. Users must ensure they are correctly authorised and familiar with the reporting process for their area of work.
Reports must include accurate details of the matter type, level of service, fee scheme, and any other required fields. This information must correspond with the work actually carried out and the evidence retained on file, including eligibility assessments and records of advice.
Accuracy is critical because errors can lead to underpayment, overpayment or claim rejection. Overclaims may result in recovery action or audit findings, while underclaims directly affect a provider’s income. Accurate reporting also supports compliance and reduces the risk of further scrutiny.
Evidence includes financial eligibility documentation, scope justification, attendance notes, correspondence and records of advice. This material must demonstrate that the work reported was properly authorised under controlled work guidance and carried out within permitted limits.
Reporting is a key focus of Legal Aid Agency audits. Auditors compare reported information with file evidence to assess compliance. Inconsistencies, missing evidence or repeated errors can result in adverse findings, payment recovery or contractual action.
Common mistakes include selecting the wrong matter type or level of service, claiming outside permitted limits, submitting claims late, and reporting information that is not supported by file evidence. Many of these errors can be avoided through training and supervision.
Supervisors help ensure that reporting is carried out correctly and consistently. This may involve reviewing claims before submission, providing guidance on classification and limits, and identifying trends that indicate a need for further training or procedural change.
If a claim is rejected, payment will not be made unless the issue can be resolved through resubmission or appeal, where permitted. Rejected claims can have financial consequences and may also highlight compliance issues that need to be addressed internally.
Updates to guidance, fee schemes or reporting processes can alter how controlled work should be reported. Providers must keep up to date with these changes and ensure that staff are informed, as reliance on outdated practices can lead to errors and non-compliance.
Good reporting practice ensures that providers are paid accurately and on time, supports audit readiness and reduces compliance risk. Over time, consistent and reliable reporting contributes to financial stability, stronger contract management and continued confidence in the delivery of controlled work.
If there’s anything we haven’t covered here or you have any specific questions about your account, just let us know and we’ll be happy to answer them. If you’re not a customer yet but curious about our plans, contact us
